Board Members Double Down on Unfunded Facilities Plan

Board of Education Action Meeting: October 29, 2026

by Lisa Haver

Students from the 17 schools targeted for closure rally on the steps of 440. (Photo: Lisa Haver)

If we are the leaders of tomorrow, we deserve to be heard today.
Student, Parkway Northwest High School for Peace and Justice

If you are not going to represent our interests, put your resignations in tonight.
CASA President Robin Cooper

Why do we need a local school board if you are going to do the same thing the School Reform Commission did?
City Councilmember Jamie Gauthier

Students, teachers, principals and parents from the 17 school communities under threat of closure rallied on the steps of 440 before the board action meeting. Student drum lines played, accompanied by Philly Elmo. Several elected officials spoke, vowing to fight the facilities plan. Ninety people had signed up to speak: 21 students, 63 adults, 2 union leaders and 4 elected officials. Yet the board set up only 165 seats in the auditorium, 75 fewer than capacity. APPS members demanded that more chairs be set up, promising to interrupt the meeting if people were detained in the atrium despite plenty of room in the auditorium. After initially saying it wasn’t possible, district staff brought in 40 more seats. When we fight we win.

Continue reading about the meeting here

Board Covers for Watlington

Board of Education Action Meeting: August 20, 2026

by Lisa Haver

APPS member Kristin Luebbert testifies at August 20 Board of Education meeting. (Photo: Lisa Haver)

Board of Education President Reginald Streater often exhorts those in attendance to respect others’ time during public testimony and presentations. That doesn’t seem to apply to the board itself. Over the past year, the board has canceled and postponed several meetings with minimal public notice. They made people guess for months about when they would finally pass the Facilities Master Plan. They unexpectedly recessed the April 23 meeting and reconvened the following week. This month, they have rearranged their calendar, again at almost the last minute. The meeting changes were not placed into an official item, and the board never took a vote; that means the public had no opportunity to comment. The August 13 Goals and Guardrails Committee meeting–canceled. The public hearing scheduled for October 15–moved up to September 3. The September 3 Goals and Guardrails meeting–canceled. The September 24 action meeting–moved back to September 30. No explanation was given for any of these changes. The board apparently has no consideration for the time and schedules of parents, students, educators and community members. Maybe that’s why they refer to us as “customers”–so they can run things like regional managers and not as a governing body accountable to its constituents.

Continue reading here

Board Bars Public from Public Meeting

Board of Education July 23, 2026

by Lisa Haver

Revised notice of Board of Education meeting in July 18 edition of Philadelphia Inquirer.

“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” 
Attributed to Evelyn Beatrice Hall, 1906. 

Just before adjourning the June 25 action meeting, Board of Education President Reginald Streater announced that there would be no July meeting. All official business of the board would resume at the August meeting. Because the board had cancelled, postponed, and changed meeting times so often this year, APPS told readers of our report to watch for a surprise July meeting. Sure enough, APPS members found a small legal notice in the July 15 Inquirer: special meeting to be held on July 23 for the sole purpose of transferring funds in order to make up for the shortage created by the delayed passage of the state budget, the Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes (TRAN). Three days later, a July 18 legal item notified the public that two charter items would also be on the agenda. The meeting would be remote only. Continue reading here

Board Passes $4.9 Billion Budget, Community Questions Priorities

by Lisa Haver

Board of Education Action Meeting, May 28, 2026

APPS member Deborah Grill testifies at May 28 Board of Education meeting. (Photo: Lisa Haver)

As a result of the Board of Education’s speaker suppression policies, over half of the 30 public speakers were representatives of charter schools, 6 from the same school. Several charter CEOs, who have daily access to the board’s Charter Schools Office, took speaker slots, including both Global Leadership Academy CEOs. Recent IRS information shows the GLA CEO making over $500,000 in annual salary/compensation/bonus; GLA Huey CEO made $378,000. Although APPS has raised these issues for years, the board says little about exorbitant administrative salaries, questionable financial practices, and failure to reach minimum academic ratings. In fact, the board exempted the entire charter sector from its $3 billion, ten-year Facilities Master Plan. 

Board Passes $4.6 Budget
The board voted 8-0 to pass the administration’s combined $4.6 billion budget for FY 2026-27 in Item 12 (BM Wanda Novales was absent). The board passed Item 15 by a vote of 7-1, approving the Amended Capital Budget for FY 2025-26, adoption of a Capital Budget for FY 2026-27, and a Capital Program for 2027-32. BM ChauWing Lam voted No on Item 15, citing some “lingering questions”. The 5-year Capital Improvement Plan includes some projects proposed in the Facilities Master Plan (FMP) passed by the board last month. Lam questioned Deputy Superintendent of Operations Oz HIll about why the budget details as presented to the board did not include construction of the new high school in the Northeast that was proposed in the FMP. Hill responded that as yet there was no funding for the school. Actually that is true of most of the projects in the FMP. APPS’ analysis of the FMP shows that at least ⅔ of the funding would come from additional revenues from the state (even though the budget presented at this meeting shows lower revenue from the state) and from unnamed philanthropic sources. BM Whitney Jones, who voted No on the FMP, remarked that the administration’s “intentions are exceeding revenues” and asked how they would fulfill the specific promises of the FMP. He asked Board President Reginald Streater to allow for regular updates on those metrics.

Continue reading