Charter Schools Have Built a Profitable Patronage Network in Philadelphia

by Alliance for Philadelphia Public Schools and Philly Power Research

The privatization of public schools has never been about improving education. The goal was to create opportunities for businesses while diminishing the political power of parents, educators and the community.  In that respect, the expansion of charter schools in Philadelphia has been an undeniable success. 

The privatization of public schools, though a reform agenda funded by wealthy corporations, individuals, and foundations, has been devastating to school districts across the country. The school privatization movement has been funded by right-wing billionaires including Jeffrey Yass, the richest person in Pennsylvania; it is a major plank in the Republican party platform. The strategies and methods of the corporate reform agenda have been incorporated into both the curricula and pedagogy of both public and charter schools, including standardized testing of children in every grade after third and the requisite test prep classes that edges out creative teaching and learning.  Students are judged on how well they can take a standardized multiple-choice test, not on creative thinking and problem-solving. Schools whose students score lower, for a number of reasons including poverty, inadequate resources and understaffing, are labeled “failing”. Schools in underserved neighborhoods have found themselves on the chopping block, either handed over to a charter company in a hostile takeover or closed for good. 

Charter schools were sold as the answer to struggling schools. They promised to improve student achievement. Some investors even contended that more charter schools would lead to the elimination of poverty and violence.

None of that has come to pass. By every measure, including those instituted to justify the creation of charter schools—data-driven education—charter schools have failed to keep the promises they made. The median Philadelphia  charter school in 2022-2023 had a lower percentage of students who scored at least proficient in PSSA math than the median Philadelphia public school. (1) Charter schools excuse their failure to meet standards by saying they are educating children in underserved neighborhoods, despite the fact that they sold themselves as a means to educate those very children. 

To read more about how charter companies have profited, continue here.

Charter CEOs Collecting High Salaries, Benefits and Bonuses

by Lisa Haver, Deborah Grill, and Lynda Rubin

Three of the six most highly paid administrators identified in String Theory’s most recent tax information are members of the Corosanite family:  Chief Executive Officer Angela Corosanite, Chief Information Officer Jason Corosanite, and Director of Facilities Thomas Corosanite. Their total salary and compensation, as listed in the charter management organization’s  2021 IRS 990, comes to almost $900,000. String Theory manages only two schools in the city, but the company has six administrators making over $100,000 in salary and compensation. In addition, each school has its own CEO. Why does a network of only two schools need so many highly-paid administrators? 

There are no guidelines for charter compensation, that is, no schedule of salary steps as there is for district principals and administrators.   Ad Prima charter, a small charter school with 600 students, has a CEO, a principal and a “site director” on staff, all paid over $100,000.00 in salary and compensation. Community Academy charter has a CEO, deputy CEO, a Chief Academic Officer and deputy CAO. Pan American, an elementary school with 750 students, lists eight administrators. Folk Arts Cultural Treasures (FACTS), on the other hand, has one administrator making over $100,000. Global Leadership Academy is a two-school network. Each school has its own CEO–one making more than the district’s superintendent, the other making slightly less. GLA’s principal  made over $11,000 more than a district principal with seven years or more of principal experience.  

Click here to continue reading and to find out what the CEO and administrators of each charter make in salary and compensation.

Board Must Reject All New Charter Applications

New Charter Applications Hearing:  December 20, 2022 

by Lynda Rubin

Four charter applicants, all of whom are currently operating charter schools that have failed to meet academic and other standards, have applied to the School District of Philadelphia to operate more. The opening hearing is a pro-forma “public” event in which charter representatives are each given 15 minutes to explain the mission of their proposed schools, with the district providing technical support for the on-screen presentations.  Members of the public, on the other hand, are given only two minutes each to state their positions for or against the creation of new charter schools.  The Board of Education seems to have gone out of its way to exclude the public from this hearing. They posted the legally required notice, in very small print, in the classified section of the Philadelphia Inquirer, but they posted no notice on the district’s website in any banner on the board’s page nor the charter schools page. APPS members and others with previous knowledge of this process hunted through the website, finally locating a small notice in the board’s calendar. Despite the fact that all board meetings have been held in person for over a year, and that all district schools and offices are open, the board is holding all charter hearings via zoom. Why?  In-person meetings have always been considered more informative, since presenters to a live audience are more engaging for all. They also provide an opportunity for people on both sides of the issue to organize and bring a unified message, as members of the Kensington Health Sciences Academy did in 2019. Their actions garnered community support and media attention. When the Board decides arbitrarily not to have fully public hearings, they are using yet another means to impose their speaker suppression policies.  Our December 15 letter to the Board asked for fully public hearings: “Consideration for charter applicants and operators should not take precedence over the rights of the community to be fully present and to express their support or opposition to new charter applications as both individuals and organizations.” The Board has not replied. 

Continue reading

Philadelphia’s school board is failing children with its lack of charter school oversight | Opinion

The playground at Universal Daroff Charter School, which closed just before the 2022-23 academic year began
Aubri Juhasz / WHYY

The following commentary was written by APPS co-founder Lisa Haver and published by Billy Penn on September 19, 2022

Students and families at two Philadelphia schools thrown into chaos just before the academic year have yet to hear those who could have prevented it take any responsibility.

Instead of providing explanations for what happened at Bluford and Daroff — the latter was shut down, and the former will close at the end of the year — Universal Companies, awarded charter contracts for the two West Philly elementary schools over a decade ago, has stonewalled those school communities.

Continue reading here